This and that -


Moderators: snaws, Justin, Volunteer Moderator Team
Unlisted because it is clearly not a printing flaw!
A bit uncalled for Rigs, write and tell Brusden White not to include then.
I'm starting to wonder if you follow me on BBC cricket forums? Just a thought...
The majority are "listed" Rigs.Flaws mixed in with damaged stamps, or anythIng you can find.
These are obviously the best stamps I can provide Rigs.Why not supply clean scans where you have bothered to extract it from your album?
The majority are straight Rigs and I have noticed this and am paying attention to straightening, I apologise if I miss some in the future (I can't edit previous posts as you well know).Or straighten them before posting?
Yes, and hopefully someone will be moved to update my thread with better examples.This site deserves it.
Well, thanks Glen. I was in the middle of making my last post on this thread as it really seemed it wasn't appreciated for what I was attempting to do. And really I was done with it.Global Administrator wrote: ↑22 Jun 2020 20:13Many are ACSC listed and many Decimal flaws are ACSC listed that I'd miss, so does not hurt to show them here.
Others might well have some to add? Keep them coming - that is how this board works.![]()
Glen
.
Hi Lakatoi 4 (Lakatoi - nice stamps), I'm not suggesting my 'stamps of interest' written here as "unlisted" are anything. Unlisted means they are unlisted, whether transient or not.
And yes Glen, I will be a sucker for thoseGlen wrote:
We have threads here with 1d Red KGV heads flaws
I am so excited!!!!Global Administrator wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020 00:33Yes here it is same size as stamp.
I just selected it as the KGV nuts are going into delirium over such stuff this week.
Does my head in .. but whatever floats anyone's boat!![]()
But its only a bust!Glen wrote:
I just selected it as the KGV nuts
That's really nice Anita!Anita wrote: ↑04 Jul 2020 10:07Thanks for the thread castoresSometimes the pics in the ACSC can be really unclear. It always helps to have additional images to refer to when trying to figure out if you have a listed variety or not.
While some of your images do appear to be surface damage, I also think it's really helpful to show unlisted flaws as well. That's one of the few ways to discover new varieties - when someone else says "hey, I have one like that too". Like the discovery of the Dirk Hartog island roo variety![]()
I recently acquired this 75c Cook stamp (the upper stamp) that has a large pale area in the top left corner. It appears to be a genuine printing anomaly rather than damage. I'd love to know if anyone else has the same flaw. I've put the normal stamp underneath.
(Sorry, should have added that these are both BW# 462.)
What are you basing your assertions on?
It's a better example than mine!
Do you have it? I don't know of it but I assume what you're saying is that it resulted from a 'transitional' posting?
Then more and more people came forward with their own examples. It's now a listed ACSC variety. You can go back through the "Flaws on Aust Kangaroo stamps? Help from the experts please!" thread to see the discovery evolve. It's reallyjosto wrote: ↑02 Aug 2008 22:49Hi!
Does anyone know about this flaw! A few month ago I found a 4d roo with an inking flaw at western australia coast that I thought to be a kind of flyspeck but now I found a second one with the same flaw! Does anyone know this flaw? Is it a kind of constant flaw?
Thanks
Blown Away!Anita wrote: ↑04 Jul 2020 12:16Josto, here on Stampboards, discovered the Dirk Hartog Island flaw on the orange 4d roo (the orange mark off the West Australian coast):
Then more and more people came forward with their own examples. It's now a listed ACSC variety. You can go back through the "Flaws on Aust Kangaroo stamps? Help from the experts please!" thread to see the discovery evolve. It's reallyjosto wrote: ↑02 Aug 2008 22:49Hi!
Does anyone know about this flaw! A few month ago I found a 4d roo with an inking flaw at western australia coast that I thought to be a kind of flyspeck but now I found a second one with the same flaw! Does anyone know this flaw? Is it a kind of constant flaw?
Thanks![]()
I don't have that variety myself, but it's definitely on my wish list!
I ACTUALLY have a list of the varieties I still want printed out so I can remember which ones to look out for when I'm at stamp fairs
Users browsing this forum: Rigs and 2 guests